|
The Nature of Ottoman Rule
The Ottoman state was a theocracy,
based on strict notions of hierarchy and order, with the sultan
exercising absolute, divineright power at its pinnacle. The system
first divided subject peoples into the domain of the faithful, the
Muslims, and the domain of war, the non-Muslims. An individual's
obligations and rights were determined by position in one of these
groups. Conversion by foreign subjects to Islam was possible, but the
Ottomans did not demand it. Instead, further religion-based
classifications were used to rule the subject population.
The non-Muslim community was divided
into millets, administrative units organized on the basis of
religious affiliation rather than ethnic origin. Accordingly, the four
nonMuslim millets were Armenian, Catholic, Jewish, and
Orthodox; the last was the largest and most influential. The millets
enjoyed a fair amount of autonomy. At the head of each of was a
religious leader responsible for the welfare of the millet
and for its obedience to the sultan. The head of the Orthodox millet
was the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople. The patriarch's
position as ethnarch, or leader of the nation, also gave him
substantial secular powers. This combination meant that the
institution of the Orthodox Church played a vital role in the
development of Greek society during the Ottoman era.
In practice, the extent of the empire
made control dependent on a complex, decentralized administrative
hierarchy. Living on their estates, designated local military leaders,
the sipahi, assumed many of the responsibilities of local
rule. Over time, the estates became hereditary and stopped serving
their intended function. In Greek territory, this policy left massive
landholdings controlled by the Ottoman Turks and worked by dependent
Greek peasants.
As the sipahi system broke
down, a form of provincial administration took its place. The empire
was divided into regions that were governed by pashas, who in turn
subdivided their realms into smaller units overseen by beys. The
Orthodox millet included two types of local government.
Ottoman officials and religious judges adjudicated civil and criminal
cases involving Muslims and Orthodox citizens. Orthodox priests and
Christian primates collected taxes, settled disputes, and effectively
governed at the local level. At times the two systems competed, and at
times they operated in coordination; the result was complexity, abuse,
and cynicism. In this atmosphere, people sought security in direct
patronage relationships with individuals in power. The Ottoman system
discriminated against the non-Muslim population by imposing special
levies of money and labor, and various restrictions were placed on
personal freedom. In court, testimony of a Muslim would always be
accepted over that of a non-Muslim. Marriages between Muslims and
non-Muslims were illegal. Most hated of all was the forced
conscription of male children for service in military or civil
service. The burden on the subject population became even heavier and
more capricious when the empire began suffering military defeats by
Russia in the eighteenth century.
Some parts of Greece were able to
escape the direct effects of Ottoman rule. The remote mountains of
central Greece, for example, were called the Agrapha, the
"unwritten", because the empire had no census or tax records
for the region. Other areas were granted special status because they
filled particular needs of the empire. Beginning in the late
seventeenth century, the Phanariotes, a group of Greek merchant
families in Constantinople, gained bureaucratic power by serving the
sultan as diplomats and interpreters. In the eighteenth century, the
Phanariotes were appointed hospodars, or princes, of the
Romanian provinces Moldavia and Wallachia.
The official role given the Orthodox
Church in the millet system made its situation in Greek
society paradoxical. On the one hand, it helped to keep the Greek
language alive and used its traditional educational role to pass on
the Greek cultural heritage and foster a sense of cultural identity.
On the other hand, the Ottoman authorities expected the church to
maintain order. The church became a very conservative institution that
protected its role by isolating Greeks from the great intellectual
currents of the West, first the Reformation and later the
Enlightenment. Secular influences first touched Greek society not in
Greece but in the communities of the diaspora.
As the feudal system crumbled, control
over such a vast domain became increasingly problematic. Because a
standing army would have been prohibitively expensive, non-Muslims
were assigned as armatoliks, or armed guards, of specified
areas and paid from local taxes. This system was abused flagrantly by
independent groups of armed men, some with official sanction and some
without, who roamed the countryside and abused the peasant population.
Myths have turned the bandits into proto-revolutionaries, but to
contemporaries in Greece and elsewhere, they were a force to be
feared.
|